Como sói acontecer, as férias foram recheadas - literalmente recheadas - com muito churrasco e iguarias florianopolitanas.
Destaques:
- a budweiser nacional que está estourando como cerveja;
- os bons preços de vinhos no super Angeloni de Floripa;
- o bacalhau na brasa;
- assar a carne, à beira mar, na Praia Brava;
- saborear tudo, em companhia da família;
- anchova na brasa, com batatas ao forno, com mostarda;
- ostras gratinadas, fresquinhas de Cacupé;
- mariscos ao bafo.
Uma boa conversa sobre o mundo - e o imundo - jurídico. Com as postagens do professor Alexandre Walmott Borges.
quarta-feira, 18 de janeiro de 2012
Vitrine do peixe
A loja instalada na Av. Liberdade em Uberlândia é a meca na cidade para a aquisição de pescados em geral. Bem organizada, atendimento de cordialidade, variedade de produtos e, muito importante, complementos à preparação de bons pratos com peixes e demais pescados.
Monjardim, BH
Recomendação aos paladares belorizontinos é o Monjardim, a costelaria que serve a costela mais suculenta que se pode imaginar. O prato pode vir em porção de 1/2 ou 1 kg, com uma costela de gordura na medida, acompanhada de pequenas porções de farofa e vinagrete. Fica em Lourdes e compensa pela gostosura do assado.
quinta-feira, 22 de dezembro de 2011
Paella no Cantina da Moqueca
Excelente a paella servida no Cantina da Moqueca. Ao início, o aviso do garçom de que o prato demora algo mais do que o normal. Talvez seja pelo capricho necessário à confecção do prato. Excelente.
quarta-feira, 21 de dezembro de 2011
A prisão do árbitro
Todos os gremistas devem lembrar da figura...é o árbitro da batalha dos Aflitos. Depois da roubalheira no Recife, a prisão confirma o que a nação tricolor já suspeitava: é picaretagem!!!!
Árbitro de futebol da PM é preso no Rio
Seg, 19 de Dezembro de 2011 14:20
Djalma Beltrami é comandante do Batalhão de São Gonçalo
A Polícia Civil do Rio de Janeiro confirmou na manhã desta segunda-feira (19) a prisão do atual comandante do 7º BPM (São Gonçalo), tenente-coronel Djalma Beltrami, acusado de participar de um esquema de recebimento de propina que seria paga por traficantes do morro da Coruja, em Neves, no município de São Gonçalo, na região metropolitana do Estado.
Beltrami, que também já trabalhou como árbitro de futebol, foi detido tão logo chegou ao quartel do batalhão, e posteriormente encaminhado para a Divisão de Homicídios de Niterói.
Outros sete policiais militares do 7º BPM também foram presos por suposto envolvimento com o narcotráfico da região e formação de quadrilha.
As acusações contra os PMs são baseadas nas investigações que resultaram na Operação Dezembro Negro, deflagrada nesta segunda-feira (19) no município de São Gonçalo.
No total, a polícia busca cumprir 26 mandados de prisão, dos quais 13 contra policiais e 11 referentes a traficantes.
Segundo a polícia, os PMs do 7º BPM cobravam taxas (o popular "arrego") para que não houvesse repressão ao tráfico de drogas na Coruja, na comunidade Marítimas, na favela Nova Brasília, entre outras localidades.
O lucro do grupo chega a R$ 160 mil mensais, de acordo com as investigações.
Beltrami atuou no massacre na escola municipal Tasso da Silveira, em Realengo (zona oeste do Rio), em abril deste ano, quando um homem entrou na unidade e atirou contra diversas crianças e depois se matou. Ele também participou da ação que retomou o Complexo do Alemão em novembro do ano passado
Árbitro de futebol da PM é preso no Rio
Seg, 19 de Dezembro de 2011 14:20
Djalma Beltrami é comandante do Batalhão de São Gonçalo
A Polícia Civil do Rio de Janeiro confirmou na manhã desta segunda-feira (19) a prisão do atual comandante do 7º BPM (São Gonçalo), tenente-coronel Djalma Beltrami, acusado de participar de um esquema de recebimento de propina que seria paga por traficantes do morro da Coruja, em Neves, no município de São Gonçalo, na região metropolitana do Estado.
Beltrami, que também já trabalhou como árbitro de futebol, foi detido tão logo chegou ao quartel do batalhão, e posteriormente encaminhado para a Divisão de Homicídios de Niterói.
Outros sete policiais militares do 7º BPM também foram presos por suposto envolvimento com o narcotráfico da região e formação de quadrilha.
As acusações contra os PMs são baseadas nas investigações que resultaram na Operação Dezembro Negro, deflagrada nesta segunda-feira (19) no município de São Gonçalo.
No total, a polícia busca cumprir 26 mandados de prisão, dos quais 13 contra policiais e 11 referentes a traficantes.
Segundo a polícia, os PMs do 7º BPM cobravam taxas (o popular "arrego") para que não houvesse repressão ao tráfico de drogas na Coruja, na comunidade Marítimas, na favela Nova Brasília, entre outras localidades.
O lucro do grupo chega a R$ 160 mil mensais, de acordo com as investigações.
Beltrami atuou no massacre na escola municipal Tasso da Silveira, em Realengo (zona oeste do Rio), em abril deste ano, quando um homem entrou na unidade e atirou contra diversas crianças e depois se matou. Ele também participou da ação que retomou o Complexo do Alemão em novembro do ano passado
Texto de Tony Judt - Hannah Arendt - TTL
Eichmann in Jerusalem’
MAY 11, 1995
Lionel Abel, reply by Tony Judt
E-MAIL PRINT SHARE
IN RESPONSE TO:
At Home in This Century from the April 6, 1995 issue
To the Editors:
I would agree with Tony Judt that the controversy about Hannah Arendt’s Eichmann book [NYR, April 6] was “absurd,” if the object of his judgment was merely the meeting called by Dissent, and in which I regret to say I took part, to debate Ms. Arendt’s theses. And this before persons assembled to either execrate or adore her. I do regret my participation in that affair and broke with Irving Howe years later when he asked me to write something justifying it.
It was not proper to address complex ideas as the Dissent meeting tried to do. But I am not sure that Tony Judt limited his critique to that meeting alone. Could he have meant that it was “absurd” to review Ms. Arendt’s book seriously? Even though it dealt with important matters, about which, as Judt himself concedes, Hannah was inadequately informed? I think quite the contrary: it would have been absurd to not challenge Ms. Arendt’s “aggression”—the word comes from her friend, Karl Jaspers—against Israel and the Jews.
One thing more. I would like to know just what “life-sustaining lies” I depended on, as Tony Judt claims, in my review of Eichmann in Jerusalem, a work whose a priori sociology was backed by so many errors of fact per page. If Tony Judt needs some education in this regard, I suggest that he look at a definitive article on the subject, Gertrude Ezorsky’s “Hannah Arendt Against the Facts,” in the Fall 1963 issue of New Politics.
Lionel Abel
New York City
Tony Judt replies:
I am grateful to Lionel Abel for his letter, as it helps me understand better why he reacted as he did to Eichmann in Jerusalem. It was not a particularly difficult book, but it did require careful reading. Mr. Abel is not a careful reader. As my review made clear, what was “absurd” about the furor over Arendt’s book was not the fact that it aroused so much debate and was reviewed seriously in so many places, but that commentators like Abel—both in his contribution to the infamous Dissent meeting and his 1963 Partisan Review article—could so patently misrepresent it. Moreover, Karl Jaspers did not charge Arendt with “aggression…against Israel and the Jews” but cautioned her of the price she would pay for attacking some of the “life-sustaining lies” on which so many people depend. Mr. Abel’s reaction, then and now, confirms Jaspers’s warning. One of these “life-sustaining lies” is the fiction that “Israel and the Jews” form a single bloc and that to criticize any part of one is to perpetrate an unacceptable attack on both. The role of a certain narrative of the Holocaust in Israeli pedagogy and in the national foundation myth was prominent and remains so. Arendt was quite right to place it at the center of her analysis of the trial; for all her errors of fact (fewer than Mr. Abel implies), her intuition has since been taken up and debated by scholars. The history of Jewish leadership during World War Two is complex and sometimes troubling, and cannot be served up as a simple tale of criminals, heroes, and victims. Like other national stories of collaboration and resistance it is full of gray zones. Mr. Abel feels understandably discomfited to see his beliefs challenged. But to persist in describing Arendt’s disquieting insights as an attack on “the Jews” shows that Mr. Abel has forgotten nothing and learned nothing in the thirty years that have elapsed since his first unfortunate foray into this arena.
MAY 11, 1995
Lionel Abel, reply by Tony Judt
E-MAIL PRINT SHARE
IN RESPONSE TO:
At Home in This Century from the April 6, 1995 issue
To the Editors:
I would agree with Tony Judt that the controversy about Hannah Arendt’s Eichmann book [NYR, April 6] was “absurd,” if the object of his judgment was merely the meeting called by Dissent, and in which I regret to say I took part, to debate Ms. Arendt’s theses. And this before persons assembled to either execrate or adore her. I do regret my participation in that affair and broke with Irving Howe years later when he asked me to write something justifying it.
It was not proper to address complex ideas as the Dissent meeting tried to do. But I am not sure that Tony Judt limited his critique to that meeting alone. Could he have meant that it was “absurd” to review Ms. Arendt’s book seriously? Even though it dealt with important matters, about which, as Judt himself concedes, Hannah was inadequately informed? I think quite the contrary: it would have been absurd to not challenge Ms. Arendt’s “aggression”—the word comes from her friend, Karl Jaspers—against Israel and the Jews.
One thing more. I would like to know just what “life-sustaining lies” I depended on, as Tony Judt claims, in my review of Eichmann in Jerusalem, a work whose a priori sociology was backed by so many errors of fact per page. If Tony Judt needs some education in this regard, I suggest that he look at a definitive article on the subject, Gertrude Ezorsky’s “Hannah Arendt Against the Facts,” in the Fall 1963 issue of New Politics.
Lionel Abel
New York City
Tony Judt replies:
I am grateful to Lionel Abel for his letter, as it helps me understand better why he reacted as he did to Eichmann in Jerusalem. It was not a particularly difficult book, but it did require careful reading. Mr. Abel is not a careful reader. As my review made clear, what was “absurd” about the furor over Arendt’s book was not the fact that it aroused so much debate and was reviewed seriously in so many places, but that commentators like Abel—both in his contribution to the infamous Dissent meeting and his 1963 Partisan Review article—could so patently misrepresent it. Moreover, Karl Jaspers did not charge Arendt with “aggression…against Israel and the Jews” but cautioned her of the price she would pay for attacking some of the “life-sustaining lies” on which so many people depend. Mr. Abel’s reaction, then and now, confirms Jaspers’s warning. One of these “life-sustaining lies” is the fiction that “Israel and the Jews” form a single bloc and that to criticize any part of one is to perpetrate an unacceptable attack on both. The role of a certain narrative of the Holocaust in Israeli pedagogy and in the national foundation myth was prominent and remains so. Arendt was quite right to place it at the center of her analysis of the trial; for all her errors of fact (fewer than Mr. Abel implies), her intuition has since been taken up and debated by scholars. The history of Jewish leadership during World War Two is complex and sometimes troubling, and cannot be served up as a simple tale of criminals, heroes, and victims. Like other national stories of collaboration and resistance it is full of gray zones. Mr. Abel feels understandably discomfited to see his beliefs challenged. But to persist in describing Arendt’s disquieting insights as an attack on “the Jews” shows that Mr. Abel has forgotten nothing and learned nothing in the thirty years that have elapsed since his first unfortunate foray into this arena.
terça-feira, 13 de dezembro de 2011
CPI privataria - do escrevinhador
Protógenes exige CPI da Privataria
publicada terça-feira, 13/12/2011 às 10:53 e atualizada terça-feira, 13/12/2011 às 11:15
Por Juliana Sada
Ontem, dia 12, o deputado federal Protógenes Queiroz (PCdoB/SP) protocolou o requerimento de abertura da “CPI da privataria”.
De acordo com Protógenes, o intuito é “investigar em profundidade as denúncias de irregularidades e lavagem de dinheiro apresentadas pelo jornalista Amaury Ribeiro Júnior”.
Confira a íntegra do requerimento, que está no blog do deputado:
publicada terça-feira, 13/12/2011 às 10:53 e atualizada terça-feira, 13/12/2011 às 11:15
Por Juliana Sada
Ontem, dia 12, o deputado federal Protógenes Queiroz (PCdoB/SP) protocolou o requerimento de abertura da “CPI da privataria”.
De acordo com Protógenes, o intuito é “investigar em profundidade as denúncias de irregularidades e lavagem de dinheiro apresentadas pelo jornalista Amaury Ribeiro Júnior”.
Confira a íntegra do requerimento, que está no blog do deputado:
Assinar:
Postagens (Atom)